Research Results
Our study demonstrates significant improvements in PTSD symptoms across both treatment modalities, with some notable differences in effectiveness and participant engagement.
Symptom Reduction
Average reduction in PTSD symptoms for ITR group
Participants
Total study participants across both groups
Duration
Weeks of treatment per participant
Completion Rate
Treatment completion rate for ITR group
PTSD Symptom Reduction Over Time
Average PCL-5 scores across treatment groups
Treatment Completion Rates
Percentage of participants by completion status
Key Findings
The study revealed several important findings about the comparative effectiveness of ITR and TF-CBT in treating PTSD:
- ITR showed a slightly higher rate of symptom reduction (53%) compared to TF-CBT (47%) over the 12-week treatment period.
- Both treatments demonstrated good completion rates, with ITR showing marginally better retention (85% vs 82%).
- Participants in the ITR group reported faster initial improvement in symptoms during the first 6 weeks of treatment.
- Long-term follow-up (6 months post-treatment) showed sustained improvements in both groups.
Clinical Implications
These results suggest that while both ITR and TF-CBT are effective treatments for PTSD, ITR may offer some advantages in terms of early symptom reduction and treatment retention. However, individual patient factors should still guide treatment selection.